Our Mission

Advocating for fair play in chess through experienced arbitration.

A group of chess arbiters discussing strategies at a tournament table.
A group of chess arbiters discussing strategies at a tournament table.
A close-up of a chessboard with pieces in mid-game, symbolizing strategy and fairness.
A close-up of a chessboard with pieces in mid-game, symbolizing strategy and fairness.

Unity

Two families advocating for fair play in chess

A group of chess arbiters discussing rules at a tournament.
A group of chess arbiters discussing rules at a tournament.
A close-up of a chessboard with pieces in mid-game.
A close-up of a chessboard with pieces in mid-game.
Two families enjoying a friendly chess match in a park.
Two families enjoying a friendly chess match in a park.
A chess tournament setting with players focused on their games.
A chess tournament setting with players focused on their games.
A banner displaying a message about fair play in chess.
A banner displaying a message about fair play in chess.

Fair Play Concerns

What is your main argument?

We believe arbiters can enforce fair play effectively without additional officers or titles.

Why oppose new titles?
How does this affect costs?
What is the historical context?
Who supports your view?

New titles increase administrative costs and create unnecessary bureaucracy.

Historically, arbiters have maintained fair play in chess without the need for additional oversight or titles.

Many experienced arbiters and players agree that existing systems are sufficient for fair play enforcement.

Support comes from seasoned chess professionals and arbiters who value tradition.